The current 4.0 version of MSF defines itself as an approach for projects that defines a set of principles, models, disciplines, concepts, guides, and practices already proven by Microsoft.
目前的MSF 4.0版将其本身定义为一种定义了一组已经由Microsoft证明了的规则、模型、规程、概念、指导和实践的开发项目的方法。
We can say that both MSF and RUP are different in some aspects and alike in others.
我们可以说MSF和RUP在某些方面不同,而在其他方面相象。
MSF ACTS as a bridge between PHA, donors, and the government.
MSF在PHA、捐助机构和政府之间发挥了桥梁作用。
MSF learned some hard lessons during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda: it was forced to pool its efforts with the Red Cross and both bodies saw many staff members killed.
1994年卢旺达种族灭绝事件使无国界医生上了几次深刻艰难的课:被迫集中红十字会和其他机构的力量目睹许多同事被害。
Again, there should be no confusion between the RUP and MSF principles.
再次说到,RUP和MSF原则之间应该不存在混乱。
A comparison of roles between RUP and MSF reveals one of the main differences between these process frameworks.
RUP和msf之间的角色比较揭示出了这两个过程框架之间的主要差别之一。
I believe a better way to compare these frameworks involves mapping a RUP iteration to an MSF iteration, which leads to mapping the MSF phases against the RUP disciplines.
我相信比较这两个框架的更好方法要包括,将rup迭代映射到msf迭代上,这将导致把MSF阶段映射为RUP规程。
Other elements of the processes defined by RUP and MSF are easier to compare. For example.
RUP和msf定义的其他过程元素更容易比较。
For example, MSF says that you must perform a functional specification, but it does not what technique should be used, which notation, etc.
例如,MSF说,您必须执行功能规范,但并没有指出应该使用什么技术,什么符号,等等。
If we had the opportunity to compare two projects solving the same problem, one using MSF and the other using RUP, the phase by phase seminaries would possibly not be apparent.
如果我们有机会比较解决同一问题的两个项目,一个使用MSF,而另一个使用RUP,那么一个阶段接一个阶段的现象将不可能出现。
Most of the MSF artifacts can be mapped to the RUP artifacts.
大多数MSF的工件可以映射到RUP工件上。
That means it's hard to directly map a RUP element to an MSF element, but I can nevertheless present similarities and suggest ways to compare the two frameworks.
这意味着很难将RUP元素直接映射到MSF元素上,但尽管如此,我也可以提出相似之处,并且提供一些比较两个框架的方法。
MSF USES the general term 「deliverables,」 while RUP defines three different types of 「work products」 : deliverables, artifacts, and results.
MSF使用通用的术语「可交付的产品」,而RUP定义了三种不同类型的「工作产品」:可交付的产品、工件和结果。
Figure 5: 「Process steps」 in the MSF Readiness Management discipline.
图5:msf预备管理规程中的过程步骤。
RUP has a greater abundance of detail and content related to a development process, while MSF treats similar concepts in a less detailed, more general way.
RUP拥有更大量的与开发过程相关的细节和内容,而MSF以不太详细,更一般的方式来对待类似的概念。
WHO has been collaborating with MSF and a number of international clinical toxicologists on the development of treatment protocols.
世卫组织正与无国界医生组织和多名国际临床毒理学家开展合作,制定治疗方案。
This seems to be happening in Haiti, too; MSF has again asked people to switch donations to its general fund.
这似乎也将发生在海地;MSF再一次希望人们将钱募捐到常规的基金中。
MSF have established an isolation centre for treatment of cases.
无国界医生组织已为治疗病例建立了隔离中心。